The difference between crown reduction and crown thinning is simpler than the names suggest. Crown reduction makes a tree smaller, while crown thinning makes its crown less dense without changing its overall size. A reduction shortens the height, the spread, or both, whereas thinning takes out some of the smaller branches inside the crown to let more light and air through, leaving the tree the same height and shape it was. Both are standard tree-pruning methods, and which one you need comes down to the problem you want to solve.
If you’ve had a tree surgeon round for a quote, you may have seen crown reduction and crown thinning written down and wondered what sets them apart. They sound similar, but they do very different jobs. Here’s what each one means and how to tell which your tree needs.
What is Crown Thinning?
Crown thinning removes a portion of the smaller branches from throughout the crown to give a more even, less cluttered density of foliage. The important point is that it does not change the tree’s height or shape at all. The outline stays exactly the same; there is just less inside it. It’s a technique used mainly on broad-leaved trees, and good practice is to keep the amount removed to a minimum, no more than around 30 percent of the crown.
The usual reasons for crown thinning are to let more light through to a garden or into the house, to reduce the wind resistance of a dense crown, and to take a little weight off the branches. One thing to bear in mind is that thinning doesn’t make a tree any smaller, so it won’t fix a tree that has outgrown its space. On vigorous species that throw out lots of new growth, it also needs repeating every few years rather than being a one-off.
